

Some testers complained of some heel slippage with the P37, and Nike adjusted this part for a more secure lockdown. The forefoot is higher and wider, which will delight people who need volume. Let’s move on to the upper, which concentrates most of the changes. Nothing to shout from the rooftops, but it’s a start! One important point flagged by a couple of reviewers: it seems that there are some early signs of sole wear (“creasing” to be exact), so that’s something to keep an eye on. The main change here is the use of Nike Grind (post-industrial recycled materials) up to 9%. The rubber outsole gives a good grip and seems sturdy. Overall, the cushioning is of moderate density. In terms of underfoot feel, male testers note that the sole is a little softer than before, while female testers report a bit more firmness (the configuration is slightly different between men and women).
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/21920712/Hawks2.png)
So it’s a good option for athletes who like good cushioning while staying clear of maximalism. The stack height is still 28 mm thick under the heel and 18 mm under the forefoot (the drop is 10 mm). For a bouncier trainer in the Nike range, we recommend the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run. At the same time, it’s not in the DNA of the Pegasus. Nothing spectacular in terms of responsiveness-this is a point that inevitably comes up every year. Let’s start with the elements that don’t change much: the midsole, with its React foam and Air Zoom unit, continues to offer comfortable and smooth cushioning. This new model keeps what worked on the 37 and course corrects the few things that disappointed runners.

The Pegasus 38 carries on down this path with only a few changes to report. Nike’s star trainer is back: the Air Zoom Pegasus 38! The previous model marked a significant overhaul in the series (with notably the introduction of React foam). Don’t have time to read the full review? Here’s what you need to know.
